We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is a Structural Adjustment Program?

By Brendan McGuigan
Updated May 16, 2024
Our promise to you
SmartCapitalMind is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At SmartCapitalMind, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

A structural adjustment program is a plan implemented by the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in a developing nation to try to get their economies to be more productive. The goal of such a program is to help the borrowing nation pay off its debts and have a growing economy that will sustain them into the future. One may be implemented as part of an initial agreement to lend money, or it may be brought in later as part of terms for the borrowing nation to receive a lower interest rate on past loans.

The idea of the structural adjustment program is one of most contentious within the so-called Bretton Woods institutions: the IMF and the World Bank. Some people feel that, since borrowing nations are usually in dire straits, they have no choice but to comply with whatever plans are laid out in order to receive funds to keep their country functioning. This means that the IMF and the World Bank can force through policies that the government and the people themselves may oppose strongly, in many ways undermining the democratic will of the populace.

In the past, the IMF and the World Bank had a fairly hands-off approach to the path borrowing nations took to trying to repay their debts. This all changed during the 1970s, when the world underwent a fairly serious period of economic hardship and many nations found themselves unable to make their repayments. The IMF and World Bank then decided that they needed to take a more hands-on approach to things, and began to draft structural adjustment program papers to nations that were planning on borrowing, letting them know what they would have to do in order to get the loans.

A program usually focuses primarily on ways the IMF and the World Bank thinks will jump-start the nation’s economy. This usually takes the form of extreme free-market strategies, such as deregulating banking sectors, removing trade barriers, privatizing natural resources and government industries, devaluing currencies, strictly adhering to balanced budgets, changing national law to make an environment more conducive to foreign investment, and building up export economies. In recent years, poverty reduction has become a cornerstone of the program as well, seeking not only to increase the nation’s gross domestic product (GDP), but also to help the populace as a whole raise their standard of living out of poverty.

Also in the past few years, the IMF and the World Bank have begun soliciting more input from the borrowers before drafting a final structural adjustment program. This input takes the form of what are called poverty reduction strategy papers and, in theory, allow the borrowing nations to come up with their own strategies to help out their populations. In practice, poverty reduction papers are often very similar to the IMF and World Bank’s program papers, leading some critics to question just how much leeway the borrowing nations are actually being given.

SmartCapitalMind is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By anon1005626 — On Oct 11, 2021

This article seeks to justify the economic exploitation of the poorest nations by the richest nations and the multinationals whose interests they represent -- exploitation which has resulted in poverty, war and starvation.

It seeks to present the capital interests which have actually caused these problems as the solution to them, by allowing the nations which they have effectively robbed to borrow some of this accumulated capital back to build an infrastructure in order to try and compete on a global market in which they are hugely disadvantaged.

It infers that that these global financial institutions should be applauded because they allow lower interest rates than they have in the past for loans, which will actually primarily benefit the biggest global multinationals in trade, rather than the working populations in the countries in which the resources for that trade will be extracted.

By anon92168 — On Jun 26, 2010

The article should include the adverse effects of SAPs and PRSPs on highly indebted developing countries and their people. The application of SAPs in a dozens of developing countries results to the people deterioration in their standards of living, reduced access to public services, devastated environments, plummeting employment prospects, and even it was the source of grievances in some African countries and etc., so it is better to watch the other side of it!

By anon87109 — On May 28, 2010

the article is so comprehensive in such a way that it can easily be understood but the article should include the conditions of SAPs in relation with the increase level of poverty in the periphery of the world core. otherwise it is academically sound.

SmartCapitalMind, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

SmartCapitalMind, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.